Dashboard/Rupert Lowe/Westminster Hall debate: Child Sexual Offender Data (e-petition 730605)
Debate · 1 Jun 2026

Westminster Hall debate: Child Sexual Offender Data (e-petition 730605)

Rupert Lowe, MP for Great Yarmouth (Restore Britain)

Official record: UK Parliament, Hansard (House of Commons). Retrieved 2 Oct 2026.

In the record, not in the score. 74 sentences from the official text. The selection rule did not choose it, so it does not count towards the score. How transcripts are chosen

Same event

1 Jun 2026

Everyone in our line-up who spoke here, each rated by the same rules on their own words. Our model rated this. The BS Index is not compared here because the speakers were scored on different measures (for example, one asked the questions and the other answered them). Compare the measures instead.

Rupert Lowe this transcript
MP for Great Yarmouth (Restore Britain)
–of 1 checked claims hold up –no questions to answer
Nigel Farage
MP for Clacton, Leader of Reform UK
–of 3 checked claims hold up –no questions to answer

Fact or Fluff

Can't verify1

1 claims checked against independent sources, chosen by a fixed rule (every material claim (one that supports an argument, a policy or an attack) in the transcripts that count towards a score; in other transcripts, up to 10 claims spread evenly across each; plus any claim an emotional passage relies on). 0 more were found but not checked yet; they do not count.

Quotes leave out filler sounds and repeated words. Words in [square brackets] correct a transcript that misheard or misspelt them. The transcript keeps every word as published.

Can't verify50% confidence
“We have been in touch with the Government and Baroness Longfield and have said that we will help them, but so far nobody has actually made contact with me.”

Claim checkedRupert Lowe's inquiry offered to help the Government and Baroness Longfield's national grooming gangs inquiry, but neither has yet contacted him.

Whether the national inquiry has contacted the speaker is not on the public record.
No source found. Left out of Accuracy.
Our model rated this · methodology v7 Excluded from Accuracy
Not yet reviewed by a person

Not counted

2

Procedural claims (the speaker's own dates, petition counts, who said what, background), clear slips of the tongue, and words read out from someone else. They stay on the record and do not count in Accuracy.

Supported“I thank the 260,974 British men and women who signed the petition to make this debate possible”Procedural: A petition count. · Westminster Hall debate: Child Sexual Offender Data (e-petition 730605), 1 Jun 2026
Supported“I want the world to hear what we heard during the two weeks of our independent rape gang inquiry hearings”Procedural: His own party's inquiry hearings: an event, not a claim. · Westminster Hall debate: Child Sexual Offender Data (e-petition 730605), 1 Jun 2026