Dashboard/JD Vance/Meet the Press interview
Interview · 12 Oct 2025

Meet the Press interview

JD Vance, Vice President

Broadcaster's transcript: NBC News: Meet the Press transcript. Retrieved 7 Oct 2026.

In the record, not in the score. 134 sentences and 12 questions from the broadcaster's transcript. The selection rule did not choose it, so it does not count towards the score. How transcripts are chosen
Claim checkedClaim found, not checkedEmotional passage flagged as deflectingEmotional passage, fits the subject

The words of JD Vance. Broadcaster's transcript, fetched on 2026-10-07. NBC's transcript of the whole interview; the programme's opening and the later segments are left out. Trimmed to the transcript: starts at "And joining me now is the Vice President of the United States, JD Vance.". Questions are shown in grey boxes. Tap a marked sentence to see the label and its sources. Other speakers' full contributions are in the transcript.

Good morning, Kristen. Thanks for having me.

KRISTEN WELKER
Well, it is good to have you on this monumental Sunday, Mr. Vice President. Let's start right there with the peace agreement in the Middle East. President Trump said this week, quote, "We have ended the war in Gaza." Mr. Vice President, do you see this moment as an end to the war in Gaza?

Well, I do, Kristen. We're going to have to do a lot of work to make sure that it stays ended. But I also have to give your network a little bit of grief, Kristen, because last night I was watching NBC. They were covering this and they mentioned that during a rally last night in Israel, when Steve Witkoff, our great special envoy, mentioned Bibi Netanyahu the crowd booed. But the broadcast didn't mention that when Steve Witkoff mentioned President Trump, the crowd actually cheered. And why is that, Kristen? Why did the crowd cheer? Because this moment came from very, very deliberate and consequential diplomacy from the president and the entire administration. The reason why we are at this moment, Kristen, is because the president of the United States, he gave unusual authorities to people who had never been in diplomacy before. He actually broke the mold. Instead of doing diplomacy the same old way that it had failed for the past 30 or 40 years, he gave Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner a remarkable amount of authority to go and get a peace deal done. And he worked hard on everybody, from the Israelis to the Gulf Arab states to make this happen. This was very hard. This was a long time coming. It required a lot of work. But yes, I believe that we are on the cusp of peace in Gaza for the first time, not just in a couple of years, but really in a very long time because the president of the United States has done something that no other world leader has been able to do: unite the Israelis with the Gulf Arab states for a common objective and that is to bring the hostages home, to stop the war, and to build the kind of long-term settlement that we really do believe can lead to a lasting peace.

AnsweredAsked whether this is the end of the war in Gaza. Says yes, that work is needed to keep it ended, and credits the administration's diplomacy.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
And of course we have covered every twist and turn of these negotiations extensively. I do want to ask you about this historic next step, Mr. Vice President, that we are anticipating, the release of the hostages. Can you tell me exactly when are the hostages going to be released? When will we see them?

Well, it really should be any moment now, Kristen. The president of the United States is planning to travel to the Middle East to gulf – to greet the hostages Monday morning, Middle Eastern time, which should be late, you know, Sunday night or very early Monday morning here in the United States. So you can't say exactly the moment they will be released. But we have every expectation, that's why the president is going, that he will be greeting the hostages early next week. It's a monumental thing. It's great of course for their families. But I really do think that it shows what happens when you go outside the traditional failed diplomatic routes and actually try something new. It's kind of crazy to me, Kristen, that for our entire history, we've never had a president who's been willing to sit down both with the Gulf Arab states and the Israelis to try to tap some unconventional people to just get a deal done. And I think Americans should be proud of the entire administration. They should be proud of their country because we've worked so hard to make peace in the Middle East happen. And we are right on the cusp of bringing these hostages home. It'll be a great moment for our country, a great moment for the world. But I really do think the lesson here is that Donald Trump refused to go down the failed –

– traditional diplomatic pathway. He cut his own Trump diplomatic pathway. And because of that, it was successful.

Partly answeredAsked exactly when the hostages will be released. Says any moment, that the exact time cannot be given, and that the president expects to greet them early next week.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
Let me ask you about what we can anticipate from the United States. NBC News is reporting that the U.S. military is preparing options to deploy as many as 200 troops to Israel to support the flow of humanitarian aid and security assistance into Gaza. Can you guarantee that no U.S. troops will ever be sent directly into Gaza, Mr. Vice President?

Yes, Kristen, so that report actually missed something. We're not planning to put boots on the ground. What we already have is a U.S. Central Command. We already have people in that region of the world. They're going to monitor the terms of the cease fire. They're going to monitor, ensure that the humanitarian aid is flowing. They actually confirmed yesterday that Israel pulled back to the agreed-upon lines, which of course is the first condition. The second condition or the second term is for the hostages to be released. So we have people in that region of the world who are going to monitor parts of this peace proposal. But the president is not planning to put boots on the ground in Israel.

Partly answeredAsked to guarantee no U.S. troops will ever be sent into Gaza. Says there are no plans for boots on the ground and describes Central Command monitoring, without giving a guarantee.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
What about Gaza? Will U.S. troops ever be sent into Gaza? Just yes or no.

That's what I mean, Kristen. He is not planning to put boots on the ground in Gaza or Israel.

We do – we are going to have Central Command troops that are already there that are going to monitor this peace proposal. We’ve actually had, and this is one of the great successes of the president's diplomacy, from Indonesia to the Gulf Arab states –

– we've had a number of Muslim majority countries offer to step up and have them put troops on the ground to secure Gaza. It's not going to be necessary for American troops to be in Gaza.

Partly answeredAsked yes or no whether U.S. troops will ever go into Gaza. Repeats that there are no plans and that it will not be necessary, without a yes or no.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
Mr. Vice President, by President Trump's own calculus, the pressure is on him to get everyone into a room and get a deal. Is it not?

Well, Kristen, I wouldn't focus on the political pressure to get a deal. We really don't care what the poll numbers say.

What we care about --

DodgedAsked whether, by Trump's own earlier words, the pressure is on him to make a deal on the shutdown. Says he would not focus on political pressure or polls, and is cut off.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
– what President Trump said?

– is what's good for the American people --

Ceremonial, not rated: An interjection while he finishes his earlier sentence ('is what's good for the American people'); the reply is the end of that sentence.

KRISTEN WELKER
What about what Mr. Trump said, his own words?

Well, Kristen, the president was talking back then when Barack Obama was president about the political realities. We are focused now on the governing realities because we're in power. And we're trying to make the American people's government work for the American people despite the fact that Chuck Schumer and the Democrats have shut down the government. We have to step back and remember, Kristen, that there is a clean bill to open the United States government. The majority – I’m sorry, the vast majority of Republicans and even a few moderate Democrats voted to open the government. But it's Chuck Schumer and the far left of Senate Democrats who have prevented this government from reopening. Now, you talk about negotiation. We're happy to negotiate about any matter. We're happy to talk about health care policy, but not while the government is being held hostage, Kristen. This is not abstract. This is not something that's pie in the sky. There are low-income women and children who will not get the food benefits they need to feed their families unless we reopen the government. We're trying to figure out how to pay our troops in the midst of this shutdown to keep our country safe –

– and to make sure that our troops get their payments. We have got to reopen the government and the president is committed to this. In fact, we've got a bill in the House that already passed the House. We want to make sure that that bill passes the Senate, but not so long as Chuck Schumer allows the entire country to be hijacked by a few far left senators.

Partly answeredAsked about Trump's own words on presidential pressure. Says they were about political realities under Obama, then moves to blaming Democrats for the shutdown.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
Mr. Vice President, we still have a lot to get to. You are in power and the administration has begun layoffs of thousands of federal workers. And yet during the 2019 shutdown under the first Trump administration, which lasted 35 days, no federal workers were laid off. Why are these firings necessary?

Well, I just think it shows the different priorities of Democrats and Republicans in the midst of these shutdowns. You really have to ask yourself, "Who do we care more about? Federal bureaucrats in Washington D.C. or low-income women getting the food benefits they deserve, our troops getting the payment they need, flood insurance across the Southeast in the midst of hurricane season?"

We are going to have to --

Partly answeredAsked why layoffs are needed when none happened in the 2019 shutdown. Frames it as a choice between federal workers and benefits, and is cut off before giving the reason.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
– is a priority?

– lay off some federal workers. Kristen, if you would let me finish. We have to lay off some federal workers in the midst of this shutdown to preserve the essential benefits for the American people that the government does provide. So we don't want to be in this situation. We don't want to be laying off federal workers. But the Democrats have shut down the government. They have forced us to choose between American citizens and federal bureaucrats. We're choosing the benefits, the critical services that benefit our American citizens.

AnsweredPressed mid-answer. Says layoffs are needed during the shutdown to preserve essential benefits, and blames Democrats for forcing the choice.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
All right. Almost out of time, a couple more questions left though. So let me ask you, of course there's a major legal battle underway about the administration's deployment of the National Guard. It does come as NBC News is reporting that the administration has been seriously discussing invoking the Insurrection Act. That would give the president the power to direct federal troops to conduct law enforcement functions in the case of a national emergency. Is that the case? Are you seriously considering invoking the Insurrection Act?

Well, the president's looking at all of his options. Right now, he hasn't felt he needed to. But we have to remember why are we talking about this, Kristen? Because crime has gotten out of control in our cities. Because our ICE agents, the people who are enforcing our immigration laws, have faced a 1,000% increase in violent attacks against them. We have people right now who are going out there who are doing the job the president asked them to do, who are enforcing our immigration laws. They're being assaulted. They're being beaten. They're being shot at. The problem here is not the Insurrection Act or whether we actually invoke it or not. The problem is the fact that the entire media in this country, cheered on by a few far left lunatics, have made it okay to tee off on American law enforcement. We cannot accept that in the United States of America. We want everybody, black or white, rich or poor, to be safe in the United States of America.

But to do that, we have to empower our law enforcement agents to keep --

– us safe. That's what we're talking about doing.

Partly answeredAsked whether the administration is seriously considering the Insurrection Act. Says the president is looking at all options and has not felt the need yet, then turns to attacks on ICE agents and the media.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
Couple of points here. First of all --

Go ahead, Kristen --

Ceremonial, not rated: A cut-off lead-in ('First of all --'); the reply is 'Go ahead, Kristen'.

KRISTEN WELKER
An Illinois judge said that state and local authorities have been able to handle protest activity, that ICE and other federal agencies have been able to continue to do their work. Crime is down in both Chicago and Portland. But is there a rebellion here? That's what would trigger an Insurrection Act. Is it imminent?

Kristen, crime is down in Chicago and Portland often because they're so overwhelmed at the local level, they're not even keeping the statistics properly. Just a couple of weeks ago, we had an ICE office get shot at by a far left assassin who was trying to kill our law enforcement officers. He fortunately didn't kill law enforcement officers. He did kill some other innocent people in the process. We cannot allow the far left in this country to tee off on our law enforcement officers.

We've got to do something about it. And that's all the president's talking about. I mean there are places in Chicago, Kristen, where people are afraid to take their children. They're afraid to go out of their houses for fear of gun violence, for fear of gang drive-by shootings. That's not okay in the United States of America. The president just wants people to be kept safe. And we're exploring everything that we can do to make sure that the American people are safe in their own country.

DodgedAsked whether there is a rebellion and whether invoking the Insurrection Act is imminent. Disputes the crime figures and describes an attack on an ICE office, without saying whether either applies.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
Mr. Vice President, we are almost out of time, about 30 seconds left. Of course, NBC News is covering and has confirmed that President Trump's social media post last month calling for his attorney general Pam Bondi to prosecute his political opponents – James Comey, Letitia James and Adam Schiff –was actually meant to be a private message. Both Comey and James have now been indicted. Is the Department of Justice acting on orders from the president to prosecute his political opponents? With the final 30 seconds we have left.

No, we're driven by the law and the facts of the case. I think if you look at the case, the facts that a far left grand jury in a far left area indicted Letitia James and James Comey. If you look at the fact that James Comey obviously lied under oath. Letitia James obviously committed mortgage fraud. What we're doing is letting the law drive the prosecution's decisions in the Department of Justice. You know who we haven't prosecuted? Joe Biden --

– or Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.

Unlike the Biden Department of Justice, Kristen --

– which actually went after Donald Trump in the midst of an election, we are not doing that. We are letting the law drive these decisions. That's exactly as it should be.

AnsweredAsked whether the Justice Department is acting on the president's orders to prosecute opponents. Says no, the law and facts drive the cases.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
Mr. Vice President, just staying on this president though, my question for you: Is the appearance of pressure a problem? The fact that he has publicly called for these indictments and now they have happened. Does that not blur the lines?

No, Kristen, I think that we continue to allow the law to drive these decisions. If the law didn't necessitate an investigation and a prosecution in this case, it wouldn't happen. Of course, the president is allowed to have opinions about the law enforcement of the federal government. He is the chief executive officer of the federal government. Him having opinions doesn't mean that we prosecute people unless we have the legal justification to do so. That is the guiding light of the Trump administration's Department of Justice. Did somebody break the law? If so, we're going to prosecute them.

AnsweredAsked whether the appearance of pressure blurs the lines. Says no, the law drives the decisions and the president may hold opinions.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
KRISTEN WELKER
All right. We covered a lot of ground today. Vice President JD Vance, thank you so much for joining us. We really appreciate it.

Thanks, Kristen. Take care.

Ceremonial, not rated: Thanks at the end of the interview.