Dashboard/Nigel Farage/ITV News interview at Reform's conference: the undercover donations sting, investigations, his family, the first 100 days and the boats
Interview · 5 Sep 2026

ITV News interview at Reform's conference: the undercover donations sting, investigations, his family, the first 100 days and the boats

Nigel Farage, Leader of Reform UK and MP for Clacton

Video: YouTube: ITV News (official channel). Retrieved 9 Oct 2026.

29 BS INDEX 0 100
Some bluff & spin
191 sentences · 30 checked claims · 31 questions
Claim checkedClaim found, not checkedEmotional passage flagged as deflectingEmotional passage, fits the subject

The words of Nigel Farage. Transcript from the video's captions, fetched on 2026-10-09; not an official record. Captions do not say who is speaking: Polifiles assigned each turn by reading the captions, without checking the audio. ITV News' upload of the interview recorded at Reform UK's conference in Birmingham (17 minutes), from the first question to his last answer; the teaser clips at the start of the upload and the closing thanks are left out. The interviewer is not named in the video description or in the captions, so the turns are attributed to "ITV News interviewer". The captions run the two voices together in places, so short fragments are assigned by meaning, not by the '>>' marks (for example "That Reform is being Well, look, there is a" is given to Nigel Farage and "you're being investigated No, there's one police investigation..." to the interviewer; "Oh, come on." and "[laughter]" stay with the interviewer; in the final exchange "Have we seen peak before?" is the interviewer's question and his answer starts at "The bottom bounce is much smaller"). Caption errors in names (such as "Dan Duke", "James Or", "Ziya Usaf" and "John Heaton") are kept as published. Trimmed: starts at "Nigel Farage, you've had 5 years creating Reform UK."; ends at "Most prominent people saying things that the vast majority of people in Britain would find repulsive.". Questions are shown in grey boxes. Tap a marked sentence to see the label and its sources. Other speakers' full contributions are in the video.

ITV News interviewer
Nigel Farage, you've had 5 years creating Reform UK. It's still a bit of a shambles, isn't it?

Well, I've had 2 years, actually. 2 years.

AnsweredTold he has had five years to build Reform and it is still a shambles. Corrects the premise: he has led it for two years.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Well, it was created 5 years ago as a name, as a brand, as a party.

Yes, I created the brand. And I said to Richard Tice, "We've left the European Union. I've been in this game for over a quarter of a century. I've simply had enough. I'm off to do other things." And Richard kept it going for 3 years, and thank goodness he did.

I've been back for 2 years. And look what we've achieved. Look what we've achieved. 2 years ago, we were here in Birmingham. We just won a handful of MPs.

We had no councilors. We had no base. Now we have 2 and 1/2 thousand councilors. We're running nearly 35 councils up and down the country. We have a parliamentary assessment process going on, which all ex-MPs from Tory and Labour say is better than anything they ever saw before.

I've recruited top people, and I promise you, I am turning this into a professional outfit. That doesn't mean that things won't go wrong. Doesn't mean that sometimes people will mis- you know, they will misbehave. And that's human nature. But no, we're making a machine.

And by the way,

AnsweredTold the party was created five years ago. Agrees he created the brand, explains Richard Tice ran it for three years, and sets out what has been built since, accepting things will still go wrong.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
But you you I mean But you are I mean, what you might call it accident-prone or shambolic, but you know, too many investigations. You had to sack two of your closest allies only in the last 24 hours. If you want people to trust you to be Prime Minister, you've got to do a lot better.

Well, I mean, look at this conference. Could any other party in Britain put on anything nearing the professionalism of what is going on here. I would argue no. Um and look, the investigations, we are living in a complainant society. I am reported to a regulatory authority or the police or something like that virtually every single week.

Partly answeredTold the party looks accident-prone, with investigations and two allies gone in 24 hours. Points to the conference and says he is reported almost every week, without addressing the two departures or whether he must do better.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Yeah, but your your your opposite numbers in the other parties aren't doing that, so it must be something about you and something about the party.

Yes, there is I'll tell you what it is. For 100 years, we've had two parties dominating British politics and an ecosystem around it. That means the appointment of quangos, going to the House of Lords, government contracts. And for the first time in a century, the new kids on the block and threaten all of that. They are not going to just stand aside and see reform take over and not fight back.

AnsweredTold other leaders are not facing this, so it must be him or the party. Gives his explanation: an establishment that will fight a newcomer.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Yeah, I mean, obviously they're going to fight back, but this is a cheap conspiracy theory. What what's at issue is whether you're running the party properly.

Well, there's no cheap conspiracy theory about Richard Tice's bank accounts being published online. There's no conspiracy theory about that. There has been a coordinated attack against us. Now, look, as I say, if we do wrong, if we do wrong, we will hold our hands up and say so. But this is an attempt, since our huge success on May the 7th, to sully our name.

Partly answeredTold this is a conspiracy theory and the issue is whether he runs the party properly. Rejects the conspiracy label and says wrongdoing would be owned, without addressing how the party is run.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
So, if you are found to have done wrong by the police, by Parliament, what does holding your hand up mean? Would you quit in those circumstances?

Well, I mean, as far as I'm concerned, there is nothing I've ever done that the police should need to take action on and I feel pretty confident, hand on heart, about that. When it comes to Parliament, well, look, you know, I have not broken any law. I've not taken any public money. By the way, my my expenses claims as an MP in 2 years is zero. I don't need it.

I've got outside income. You know, the accusation is I didn't fill in a piece of paper. All right, I mean, that's actually what we're talking about here. That is actually what we're talking about. And I would have thought in the light of the murder of Ann Widdecombe and given some of the serious security issues that I've faced here, even yesterday, that people might understand why I was given that sum of money.

DodgedAsked what holding his hand up would mean and whether he would quit if found at fault. Says he has done nothing wrong, then turns to his expenses and his security, without saying what he would do.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
You and I have known each other for many years. You are probably the least naive politician I've ever met, all right? So, when I saw the undercover filming of you in a really friendly way talking to people who were trying to persuade you it would be okay for illicit American money to be funneled through some British bloke, and you're being friendly, I'm just thinking to myself, why didn't you just tell them to hop off?

Because I asked them, I asked them and my people, and you see it in the video, is this all above board? Has this all been checked out? That is there in the video.

AnsweredAsked why he did not tell the undercover donors to go away. Says he asked whether it was all above board.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
it ringing alarm bells in your head? Why didn't you Why didn't you just walk out the lunch?

Because I was assured by both sides that it was above board, right? I was coming in at the end of the process. I'd never met these people before. And then, I'm told it's a global family trust and run from London. And a global family trust can get income from all over the world.

So, I didn't question it, I didn't query it.

AnsweredAsked why he did not walk out of the lunch. Says he was assured it was above board and told it was a family trust, so he did not query it.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Now, look, you've got rid of the two internal architects of all this, James James Or and Dan Duke.

Yeah.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: the interviewer notes the two aides have gone, the reply is 'Yeah.', and the question follows under x10.

ITV News interviewer
But what does it say about your judgment in picking them in the first place?

Oh, come on. Come on. You've been around forever. You know, for decades peerages have been sold by both the Labour and Conservative parties. Give 5 million, we'll put you in the House of Lords.

You know, we've seen funding scandals of all kinds. Have a look.

DodgedAsked what picking the two aides says about his judgement. Turns to peerages and funding scandals in other parties, without addressing his choice of aides.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
So, what are you saying? That the way they were behaving was okay?

No, no, no, I'm not saying that for a moment. I'd equally say, have a look at Labour's donors pre-2024 and government contracts that have been given out. I am not

AnsweredAsked whether he is saying the aides' behaviour was acceptable. Says no, then adds a point about Labour donors.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Hang on, this is what about Nigel? What you know

I am saying that what happened was injudicious at best. What was said was injudicious at best. It's subject to an investigation, but I would also say it's not just us.

AnsweredTold this is whataboutism. Says what happened was injudicious at best and is under investigation.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Right. Well, you know, obviously I spent my life trying to uncover, you know, wrongdoing by the other parties. But Dan Dukes did say or imply that you had used this illicit route

I know.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: the interviewer starts to put the aide's remark, the reply is 'I know.', and the question follows under x14.

ITV News interviewer
in other cases. Are you 100% confident that never happened?

Yes, I am. And I I put that down to loose pub talk regarding

AnsweredAsked whether he is fully confident the illicit route was never used before. Says yes, and puts the aide's remark down to loose talk.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
that for God's sake?

Because he was trying to persuade this bloke to do something. Look, it As I say, it was injudicious at best.

AnsweredAsked why the aide would say it. Says he was trying to persuade the donor, and calls it injudicious.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
There seems from the outside and you'll understand why I'm saying this to be still, despite the fact you're saying you're trying to professionalize this party, a cultural issue in Reform of corners being cut. Are you aware and are you going to do something about it?

That Reform is being Well, look, there is a

Ceremonial, not rated: Cut-off fragment: the reply stops after a few words ('Well, look, there is a') as the interviewer presses on; the point is pursued under x18 and x19.

ITV News interviewer
you're being investigated No, there's one police investigation into the 500,000 cultural donations. There's another potential investigation into this lot. There's the parliamentary staff. This looks like a pattern.

And it will go And it will go on.

Ceremonial, not rated: Cut-off fragment: the reply ('And it will go on') breaks off and continues under x18.

ITV News interviewer
to look at yourself and clean it out.

back and see me in 6 months, there'll be five more investigations. It won't end. This won't end.

Partly answeredTold he needs to look at the party and clean it out. Says there will be more investigations and they will not end, without saying whether anything inside the party needs fixing.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
But you can't just blame outsiders who don't like you. There must be cultural stuff going wrong in Reform.

because you're part of the establishment.

Don't get it. They are not going to give us a free ride. They will do anything they can. I expect many more investigations over the course of the next few months. I've no doubt about it.

None.

Partly answeredTold he cannot just blame outsiders and something must be wrong in Reform's culture. Says the interviewer is part of the establishment and expects more investigations, which disputes the point without engaging with the party's culture.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Now look, in your customized suit, you look as though you're enjoying

Oh, yeah.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in remark about his suit; the reply is 'Oh, yeah.' and the question follows under x22.

ITV News interviewer
yourself. But, some of your colleagues were fearful that when this barrage of unpleasant stuff started to be unloaded on Reform, you were thinking of quitting. Were you?

No, I wasn't thinking of quitting, but I'll tell you what happened. And a lot of people noticed over the summer that my usual quite jolly demeanor

was perhaps absent. And I, you know, accept that. I accept that and I

AnsweredAsked whether he was thinking of quitting over the summer. Says no, and accepts his mood was low.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
And and you've And you talked about the pressure on your family, which you hated. Was there a moment where you just thought the price for you personally of carrying on was too much?

Well, let's put it like this. You know, it's 34 years since I first stood in a by-election and got involved in politics. And all the way through that, my family have always supported me. Many of them agree with my politics. One or two take a different view, but they've always supported me all the way through until this summer.

Until this summer.

And suddenly

Partly answeredAsked whether the personal price ever felt too much. Describes his family's support ending this summer, without yet saying how close he came.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
So, how did you deal with that?

most of my family say, you know, give it up. Walk away. And the impact on them is horrific. Even last week, another horrific round of debanking

of people closely related to me. So, you know, I have had, I'll be honest, you know, when your own family start to turn on you because of what you do, some very thoughtful moments, very very thoughtful moments.

AnsweredAsked how he dealt with his family's turning against his politics. Describes the pressure on them and says he had very thoughtful moments.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
So, how close did you get to

I didn't get that close. I didn't get that close to quitting, but but but I think that sense of upset and exasperation was there.

AnsweredAsked how close he came to quitting. Says not that close, but the upset was real.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
And in terms of where you are now, you think there may be an election in the spring. I mean, my judgment is it may be a bit longer than that. Are you absolutely confident you will lead Reform into the next election?

Oh, yes. No question about that. No question about that. I mean, I'm going to do that. And I tell you, we may have had a bit of a setback this summer and we have, and that's you know, that's I mean you know, markets never move in straight lines.

I still really believe that by the time the next election comes, we will be seen as the only party on the center right that actually has a chance of winning.

AnsweredAsked whether he will lead Reform into the next election. Says yes, without question.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Yeah. I mean, a lot of people have seen your colleague Ziya Usaf as somewhat grandstanding, making it clear that he'd rather like your job. Do you want to Do you want to Do you want to Do you want to send a message to him?

Do you know what? He's not the first in politics, is he? [laughter] He's not the first in politics to have ambition. By the way, he's a very, very talented communicator.

AnsweredAsked for his message to Zia Yusuf, seen as wanting his job. Says ambition is normal in politics and praises him.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Yeah, but you're just saying this is not his time. Is that what you're saying?

If If these thousands of people out there would prefer would prefer Ziya or someone else to me, do you know what? I'd recognize it.

Partly answeredAsked whether he is saying it is not Yusuf's time. Says he would accept it if members preferred someone else, without saying yes or no.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Now, I want to talk to you about your what you've described as your first 100 days.

Yes.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: the interviewer introduces the first 100 days, the reply is 'Yes.'.

ITV News interviewer
Um when Donald Trump declared a national emergency, that means something in American law, as you know. It means he has power of the purse. Um it doesn't really National emergency in the UK context doesn't really mean anything.

Well, when you've got terrorists crossing the English Channel every week, people who may well do us enormous harm, people being sent in by the Iranian regime, as I was the first to point out in Parliament many months ago, that is a national emergency. Of that, I have no doubt at all.

Partly answeredTold a national emergency means nothing in UK law. Says the Channel crossings are an emergency, without addressing what the declaration would do in law.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
But, in terms of actual powers, you don't get any additional powers. All you're doing is saying to your MPs this matters.

What we're saying to What What we're saying What we're saying to Parliament is, "Sorry, guys, summer recess is canceled. This place is going to sit 6 days a week. It's going to sit all the hours God sends."

Partly answeredTold the declaration gives no extra powers. Says Parliament would sit six days a week and lose its recess, without addressing the point about powers.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
going to pack out the House of House of It doesn't sound very democratic. You don't even like the House of Lords, but you're going to pack it out.

Well, hang on a second. You know, I mean, I made it very clear on the platform yesterday that if we are elected, if we if we win on a very specific, clear manifesto, I would expect the House of Lords to honor the Salisbury Convention that has been around for over 100 years. I would expect them to. But if they decide they want to obstruct it, well then we'll fight back. And we will use whatever means we can to get some change.

You know, think about politics and the level of disenchantment is people feel that an election after election, they're told things by parties who want power for the sake of power. I'm not interested in that. Not in the least bit interested in that. What I'm interested in is getting genuine fundamental change and turning this country around in a number of key areas. And so we are saying, you vote for us, these ministers will be given jobs, really big pledges to get through in 100 days, and if they fail, I will sack them.

AnsweredTold packing the House of Lords is undemocratic. Says he expects the Lords to respect a manifesto mandate, and that obstruction would be met with whatever means are needed.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Now, most of us, when Rishi Sunak said he was going to stop the the boat, thought it was a bit of grandstanding and a bit of a joke. You've said you're going to stop it in 100 days.

Absolutely.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: the interviewer recalls his 100-day pledge on the boats, the reply is 'Absolutely.', and the question follows under x38.

ITV News interviewer
That's also a bit of a joke, isn't it? It's just impossible to stop in 100 days.

Oh, I'm tired of being told you can't do this and you can't do that.

AnsweredTold stopping the boats in 100 days is impossible. Rejects that, citing Australia and French co-operation (the reply runs on under x39).Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Well, you're not in power yet, so let's just see what you

impossible. Tony Abbott did it in Australia in 2012. He stopped the boats in 2 weeks. In 2 weeks, he stopped the boats. The boats were coming from Indonesia, boats with 2 or 300 people on.

They were headed for 50,000 people a year coming into Australia. Within a fortnight, Abbott turned it around. If you've got the will, you can do it. And frankly, to have Jordan Bardella here yesterday, and let's face it. I mean, he and Marine Le Pen are odds-on favorites to win next year.

To have a French government that genuinely wants to work with us and cooperate and will accept us taking boats back over the channel. Do you know what? We could end this trade. If we get the legislation done, we could end this trade in less than a fortnight.

Ceremonial, not rated: Interjection ('you're not in power yet'); the reply continues the answer begun under x38.

ITV News interviewer
When we're when we're on this subject, you may have seen there are quite a large number of masked men out in Dover today saying that they are protesting against the channel crossings. But people there are feeling very intimidated. There's been disruption to travel. Is that the right way to protest?

Intimidation goes both ways. You know, there's intimidation through mothers walking through a park with their kids where there are gangs of men just idling around staying at staying at HMOs or hotels. I do not approve of what is happening in Dover today. I do not approve of mass people turning up and protesting anywhere, whatever side of the argument they're on.

AnsweredAsked whether the masked protests in Dover are the right way to protest. Says he does not approve, while saying intimidation goes both ways.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Now obviously your conference was disrupted by protesters.

Yeah.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: the interviewer notes protesters disrupted the conference, the reply is 'Yeah.', and the question follows under x42.

ITV News interviewer
But there are allegations and the police are looking at this that the way that your security people removed them was over the top.

Honestly. Honestly, it's all one way, isn't it? You know, I can have milkshakes chucked in my face, be bashed over the head with with placards, and that's all fine. That's absolutely fine. Yet when we have a big event that people have paid a lot of money to come to, and we get people there trying to disrupt it and we remove them, suddenly we're in the wrong.

Utter nonsense.

AnsweredTold police are looking at whether his security staff removed protesters with too much force. Rejects the criticism as one-sided and says disruptors are removed.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
So even if charges do end up being pressed, that's just not an issue for you.

Please. Please, this is just all so one-sided. It is ridiculous. There were people there trying to disrupt our conference. We always have them.

We always have them, and we remove them quickly and expeditiously.

Partly answeredAsked whether charges would be of no concern to him. Calls the question one-sided and repeats that disruptors are removed, without addressing the possibility of charges.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
Final question. You're being I mean, you were only a few months ago well ahead in the polls.

All right.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: the interviewer notes Reform was ahead in the polls, the reply is 'All right.', and the question follows under x45.

ITV News interviewer
You're currently being squeezed, I would say, from both the left in the form of a slightly resurgent Labour Party under Andy Burnham, uh a Tory Party that also appears to be getting its act together, and then on the right you've got Low and Restore also squeezing you. Have we seen peak before?

The bottom bounce is much smaller than most people thought it was going to be and I I sense one of the reasons I think the early election is coming. I sense that the UK bond market is in for a very very torrid time. I genuinely I just don't see in the budget. On October the 28th. What John Heaton can do.

Because his hands are tied by the labor backbenches and the conservatives well I mean Kemi has been pushed by the Tory press. As if she's the new Messiah. There's no impact in the country. And in the areas where they are getting a bit stronger, they're the safe Tory areas already. They don't exist in the middle of the north.

They're gone. I mean they are in deposit losing territory in those areas. On restore, well look. I think as the public begin to understand. Some of the fellow travelers.

That restore have accepted. And some of the things that they stand for. Frankly things we haven't heard in Britain since the 1930s. Around Jewish people etc. I I think you'll find there'll be a change.

AnsweredAsked whether Reform has peaked, with Labour, the Conservatives and Restore squeezing it. Takes each in turn and says the squeeze will not last.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
ITV News interviewer
So there's literally no chance of any pact between you and restore at all is there?

Well not with some of their key. Most prominent people saying things that the vast majority of people in Britain would find repulsive.

AnsweredAsked whether a pact with Restore is ruled out. Says not with some of its most prominent people.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person