Dashboard/Nigel Farage/BBC Radio 4 Today interview with Nick Robinson: the £5m gift, Andy Burnham, the Makerfield by-election and Brexit
Interview · 23 Jun 2026
BBC Radio 4 Today interview with Nick Robinson: the £5m gift, Andy Burnham, the Makerfield by-election and Brexit
Video: YouTube: BBC Politics (official channel). Retrieved 9 Oct 2026.
Some bluff & spinProvisional
71 sentences · 11 checked claims · 23 questions
Answers questions
74%
23 questions rated. Answered = 1, Partly answered and Declined openly = ½, Dodged = 0.
Answered 14Partly answered 4Declined openly 2Dodged 3
Nick Robinson
Now, for weeks you've been saying vote for us to get rid of Starmer. He's gone, isn't it? The danger that people say it's not just over for him, it's over for your chances of becoming Prime Minister.
Partly answeredPut to him that with Starmer gone his own chances of becoming Prime Minister may be over. Agrees Starmer was an asset to Reform, then turns to Burnham's lack of a mandate, without saying whether his chances have fallen.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
You know though that the rules say there doesn't need to be a general election. There've been many changes of Prime Minister without having a general election. You just fancy your chances.
AnsweredTold the rules do not require a general election and that he just fancies his chances. Says it is not just that: a Prime Minister needs a mandate and Burnham did not stand in 2024.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Yes. Well, you're obviously not convinced, and you hope you hope not given that you fancy being Prime Minister yourself. Now, of course, you have just had an election in which you could have taken down Andy Burnham, and you lost and you lost it badly in truth, didn't you? Even if you'd added your vote together with your old enemy Rupert Lowe, you wouldn't have won. Now, was that because of your choice of candidate?
You chose a man who had tweeted his sexual fantasies about a TV star wasn't really serious, was it?
Partly answeredAsked whether Reform lost Makerfield badly because of its choice of candidate. Says the vote was large and the contest became a vote to remove Starmer, without addressing the candidate.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Wrong candidate?
AnsweredAsked whether it was the wrong candidate. Says the posts were not found in vetting and admits they did not help.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Why didn't you either withdraw him or get him to apologize?
AnsweredAsked why Reform did not withdraw the candidate or get him to apologise. Gives three reasons: too late to withdraw, a good local candidate, and the apology was his own decision.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
here, I guess, as we get closer to a general election, whether it's on the original schedule or as you expect next May, is whether Reform UK is seen as a protest vote or seen as serious. So let me ask you something about you. Would you be happy if the next Prime Minister of this country secretly banked a 5 million pound check from a billionaire whose business interests he was promoting?
AnsweredAsked whether he would be happy if the next Prime Minister secretly banked £5m from a billionaire whose business interests he promoted. Rejects the premise that he promotes the donor's business interests. (Premise challenged.)Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
I asked you in general as a principle. I hadn't come to you, but would you would be happy if any candidate to be Prime Minister banked a secret check for 5 million pounds?
Partly answeredAsked as a principle whether any candidate for Prime Minister should bank a secret £5m. Answers with a question about why it is called secret, without saying whether that would be acceptable.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Well, you didn't reveal it. It was revealed by the newspaper you taking 5 million pounds.
AnsweredTold he did not reveal the money and a newspaper did. Asks why he should have, and goes on to say he was not in politics at the time.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Because we believe that people should govern in the national interest, not in the financial interests of themselves or their supporters.
AnsweredTold the rules exist so people govern in the national interest. Replies that he was not in politics.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
You telling me you weren't discussing becoming an MP?
Partly answeredAsked whether he was not then discussing becoming an MP. Repeats that it was not politics, without addressing the discussions; the captions are fragmentary here.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
We did a 40-minute interview about whether you might become a member of Parliament.
AnsweredReminded of a 40-minute interview about whether he might stand. Says it was a very difficult decision and he had far from made up his mind.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
And you took 5 million pounds from a billionaire who wants government and the Bank of England to change its policy.
AnsweredTold he took £5m from a billionaire who wants the government and the Bank of England to change policy. Says it is his own long-held position on crypto.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Just to explain to people cuz you know, we didn't get the chance. You have long argued for cryptocurrency, that's true. You think the Bank of England's making a mistake by coming [clears throat] up with the idea of effectively a public crypto coin, if you like a a sort of digital currency, an official one. But you're promoting something that would massively financially benefit a man who gave you 5 million pounds and you didn't think we deserved to know it.
AnsweredPut to him that he promotes policy that would benefit his donor and did not think the public deserved to know. Gives four points: he was not in politics, the rules did not require it, it is under investigation, and London trading would not move prices.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Let's be clear, there is an inquiry into whether you broke the rules and if you did
AnsweredReminded that there is an inquiry into whether he broke the rules. Accepts there is.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
and but but also you have to declare it within a year of becoming a politician. It isn't just at the time you are a politician and they'll assess whether you did.
AnsweredTold the rules require declaring benefits from the year before election. Says that applies if the money was linked to political activity.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Let Let's be clear what I'm asking and I'll give you the chance to answer it. Okay. The reason I'm pushing this is because we know that why we have rules on taking money, particularly vast, unimaginable sums. For most people in the country, £5 million into your own bank account. We have those rules to be sure that you're doing what is in our interest and not in your interest.
So, it's very clear, Mr. Farage, you've got lots of generous benefactors, you could give this money back.
DodgedTold he could give the money back. Replies that Boris Johnson received a gift from the same donor.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Will you give this money back?
DodgedAsked whether he will give the money back. Asks whether the interviewer will give his salary to charity, without answering.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
I I'm not running to be prime minister. You
DodgedTold the interviewer is not running for Prime Minister. Repeats the salary challenge as a condition.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
I'm not running to be prime minister.
AnsweredTold again the interviewer is not running for Prime Minister. Replies that the interviewer also holds a responsible public position.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Well, but you know, one day maybe I'll come on your interview program, you can interview me. But meanwhile, I'm interviewing you about you becoming prime minister and taking on the most important job. Will you give the money back?
Declined openlyAsked again whether he will give the money back. Says it is none of the interviewer's business and would be a private matter.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Well, you could say no, but it sounds to me like you're saying you might give it back.
Declined openlyTold it sounds as if he might give it back. Says it is none of the interviewer's business unless the Standards Commissioner decides otherwise.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Understood. Now, the reason I say it's of interest, of course, is that you mocked the prime minister, he is still the prime minister, Keir Starmer, and your party attacked him for taking money for free glasses and for suits. By one calculation, this is 1 270th of the amount of money you've taken. If Starmer shouldn't have taken money for glasses and suits, surely you should not
AnsweredAsked why, if Starmer should not have accepted glasses and suits, he should keep £5m. Says Starmer was Leader of the Opposition while he was a broadcaster, so the cases differ.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person
Nick Robinson
Now, talking of that, broadcasting on GB News, and indeed, what you've done for many, many years, what we know is you are defined by your views on Europe. You've consistently argued for it. And given that it's the anniversary of a rather important decision, Brexit, people, I think, are entitled just to a simple answer. Do you now in any way regret your recommendation to Britain that we should leave the EU because you claimed it would make us richer and it would get immigration down.
AnsweredAsked whether he regrets recommending Brexit. Says no, and blames the establishment for not implementing it.Our model rated this
Not yet reviewed by a person