Dashboard/Andy Burnham/Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg interview: social care, the public finances and masked anti-migrant protests
Interview · 27 Sep 2026

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg interview: social care, the public finances and masked anti-migrant protests

Andy Burnham, Prime Minister

Video: YouTube: BBC Politics (official channel). Retrieved 7 Oct 2026.

27 BS INDEX 0 100
Some bluff & spin
206 sentences · 33 checked claims · 31 questions
Claim checkedClaim found, not checkedEmotional passage flagged as deflectingEmotional passage, fits the subject

The words of Andy Burnham. Transcript from the video's captions, fetched on 2026-10-07; not an official record. Captions do not say who is speaking: Polifiles assigned each turn by reading the captions, without checking the audio. BBC Politics' upload of the live studio interview on BBC One's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg in Liverpool on the eve of the Labour conference (broadcast 27 Sep 2026, per the video description), from the first question to his last answer. Left out: the presenter's one-line lead-in ("Well, let's speak to him this morning"; the report she refers to, "as we heard just there", is not in the upload) and her closing thanks. The presenter is named in the video title and he addresses her as "Laura". Turns assigned by meaning rather than the '>>' marks: the captions often clip the first words of a turn ("are we talking about then?", "will.", "me just come back", "on, you're not answering") and run overlapping words together. His short acknowledgements ("Yeah.", "Mhm.", "Yes, there is.") are kept as his turns. Doubtful: the exchange about the economy and "the gold medal" (from "That has impacted [clears throat] the gold medal" to "No one's asking for a gold medal"): the first part is given to him and "No, no one is No one's asking for a gold medal" to Laura Kuenssberg; and "on a grand scale. So many people in their 20s stuck on benefits" in the welfare exchange is given to him, after her remark "we talked about that before at some length". Trimmed: starts at "Prime Minister, welcome in your childhood stomping ground"; ends at "And that's what this week is all about.". Questions are shown in grey boxes. Tap a marked sentence to see the label and its sources. Other speakers' full contributions are in the video.

Laura Kuenssberg
Prime Minister, welcome in your childhood stomping ground of Liverpool. Um in July, as we heard just there, you told us you would go as fast as you can on sorting out care for the elderly and vulnerable in England, social care as it's known. Where have you got to now, 3 months later?

We are making really good progress now. And for me, obviously, coming in to this journey as Prime Minister, as my dad was ending his, has been hard, but it pushes me on. And I'm going to grasp the nettle on social care. When I was in Parliament first time round, in fact, when I was a a new MP, my gran was going through the care system. And as Health Secretary, I remember saying, "We shouldn't let what happened to my grandparents' generation happen to my parents' generation." And it's devastating, actually, to be here and it has happened.

Parliament just ignoring this issue cuz they consider it too difficult. You know, is there Is there any wonder that politics is in such low esteem with the public when it can't fix something as basic as the care that we give to each other? So, it can't carry on. Somebody needs to uh grasp the nettle. I will be the one to do that.

And I realize it might require me to spend some political capital, that it might make me unpopular with some, but that isn't going to stop me.

Partly answeredAsked where he has got to on social care three months on. Says good progress is being made and he will grasp the nettle, without saying what has been done.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
If people weren't aware, your father, Roy, passed away actually less than 2 weeks ago. I think it's a fortnight tomorrow. So, this is obviously hugely personal for you, as it is personal for so many families who'll be watching this morning. What will a new system mean? What will you offer people? By when will it happen? So, let's start with what you're actually going to do.

So, it's something that I proposed many years ago, a national care service. You have to have a situation where the care system speaks the same language as the health system. Cuz at the moment social care is charged for, provided on a very different basis, and the two just don't connect. And the worst of all worlds is happening in that the care system is so threadbare, it can't support people in their own homes, or it can't support people in care homes, or people can't afford to pay pay the charges, and then we see people arriving in hospital every day in their thousands on 999 calls into A&E, which also is the most expensive part of the system, is not where they should be, is not right for them, their family, certainly not right for the NHS staff. So, the whole system is working in the wrong way.

Partly answeredAsked what a new system would offer and by when. Describes a national care service that works with the NHS and the problems with the current system; gives no timing.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
And those are the problems right now as you see it, but what are you to be really clear, are you proposing a universal service, universal free care for people? Let's be really specific here. Do you mean free personal care for everyone who needs it in England?

So, I will set out more this week at the conference, and I will set out a timetable as to how we make this reform happen. But I am talking about a system that works on NHS principles.

Partly answeredAsked whether he means universal free personal care. Says a system on NHS principles and more detail at the conference, without a yes or no.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
So, free at the point of use and universal?

That is the only way that you can make it work. There is free personal care elsewhere in the UK.

AnsweredAsked whether that means free at the point of use and universal. Says that is the only way to make it work and points to free personal care elsewhere in the UK.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

I don't think it's right that people in England don't get the same. Um and it's [clears throat] not uh something that we're going to rush. We can't rush because of what you said at the start of the interview. The challenge in the public finances is real. Uh so, it has to be done carefully uh without uh putting extra strain on the public purse.

But I will bring forward proposals. Bear in mind Baroness Louise Casey is still doing an official review for us. So, I will set out the vision, if you like, on Tuesday. Louise will then help us with the how. How do we make this happen?

When can we make it happen? But what I'm saying to you this morning, Laura, is I am not uh going to do what others have done and just say, "Oh, I'm looking in a different direction. This is all too difficult." To be honest with you, broken social care will, in the end, break the National Health Service if we leave it like it is because staff in the NHS, God love them, staff in the NHS talk of corridor care being an everyday reality in hospitals across England. And then if I look at the people who cared for my dad, you know, they must just feel invisible to the political class. They work day in, day out with huge uh humor and humanity and skill in what they do, keeping a threadbare system, if you like, trying to hold it together, but caring for other people's parents on poverty pay.

How have we let this go on so long?

Laura Kuenssberg
One of the reasons though why politicians have looked at this and then backed off is the cost. So, you've set out very clearly here you want there to be a system for everyone in England that is free at the point of use cuz you've committed to the same principles as the NHS. If you look at that what that might cost, some estimates say 18 billion pounds a year, that's Health Foundation figures. Some people estimate even more than that.

It's not that high. It's not not on the figures that I

AnsweredTold one estimate puts the cost at 18 billion pounds a year. Says the figure is too high on the figures he has seen.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
are we talking about then?

that high. But, can I directly deal with this issue of the cost cuz it's as if there isn't a cost at the moment. There is a cost. People are paying care charges now. They are spending tens of thousands of pounds from their savings, sometimes losing their homes.

That is what's happening at the moment. So, to suggest there isn't a cost to people at this moment in time, there's a huge cost. Social care in England is as unfair as American healthcare where the most vulnerable in society can lose everything. They can be wiped out, not just by the condition that they have, but wiped out financially. So, there is a massive cost and there is also a cost to the National Health Service, as I said, because there are a huge number of people in hospitals across England every day who are medically fit to be discharged home, but can't be discharged home because the social care isn't there.

DodgedAsked what the cost would be, then. Gives no figure and turns to the costs families and the NHS already bear.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
you look at those numbers, they've been at around 12 or 13,000 for as long as I can remember. So, everybody knows the scale of the problem and the consequences of it. But for you as Prime Minister, in order to do this, you will have to decide where you will get the money from in order to do it.

will.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: she says he will have to decide where the money comes from, the reply is one word ('will.'), and the question is put in full under x08.

Laura Kuenssberg
So, where will it do it from? Because where will it come from?

and that is something I will begin to say more about later this week, but there is still a review ongoing and I won't do anything that I can't, if you like, look the public in the eye and say, I think this is the right thing to do. I am going to show leadership on this on this issue. I will not leave office without giving my all to fixing to fixing this and I will be honest with people. I'm not going to do any sleight of hand here. We will set out the issues.

I will try to build consensus. I've already started cross-party talks and will come back to cross-party talks. And I won't I won't, if you like, dodge the difficult questions. I'm going to I'm going to rip the plaster off, if if if I can put it that way, because someone has to do it.

Declined openlyAsked where the money will come from. Says he will say more later in the week and a review is under way.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
So, let's then be You say you want to be honest, you want to look people in the eye. You can look the country in the eye right now and say you want care in England to be like the NHS. Everyone pays for the NHS. It comes out of general taxation. So, is that how this is going to work? Everyone will contribute if everyone's covered? Because that means more tax.

It It will be a system of that kind. So, everyone contributes. Everyone's covered, but not precisely necessarily in the same way that we currently pay for the NHS. So, this is for Baroness Casey to advise us on the best

Partly answeredAsked whether everyone will contribute through tax. Says everyone contributes and is covered, but not necessarily as the NHS is funded, and leaves the method to the Casey review.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
Prime Minister, you know where you're going with this. You've been thinking about this for years.

I have been thinking about 60 years, and I'm making a speech on Tuesday, and I will I will say more there. I'm not I'm not avoiding your your question. I will just set it out in the right way because the history of this has been in an interview like this, the opposition party will leap on one comment, and then they will call uh the policy a dementia tax or a death tax. Can I just say, we have dementia taxes right now, and people can lose everything they've worked for paying those taxes. So, the the idea that there isn't already a cost is just wrong.

It's just making that cost fairer and spreading it across across the population.

Declined openlyPressed that he knows where he is going with this. Says he will set it out in Tuesday's speech and explains why he will not do so in an interview.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
spread the cost across the population. That then sounds different to what you just mentioned, what you as Health Secretary mentioned all the way back at suggested back in 2009. Your proposal then, was to bring in a better system of social care paid for by among other ways, paid for by a levy on people's estates, the money they wanted to leave behind for their children. As you said, it was branded a dementia tax. Is that off the table?

Uh nothing is off the table at this moment in time. Now, that doesn't mean that I'm going straight back to the proposal that I had in 2010. So, I know people will be saying, "Well, well, tell us what what it is." The facts of the matter are I'm going to lay out a broad direction on Tuesday, and then Baroness Casey is going to help me work up the details that we will put to cross-party talks cuz we do have to build consensus. But I I want to say this, Laura, if we continue to approach this issue with politics as usual, where people are scoring points, and they're taking a a proposal and then trying to frighten the public at home about it, we will never fix it. And can we honestly justify that the politics in this country cannot face an issue like this and and deal with it because we're too scared of it, cuz it's bigger than where politics and politicians are these days.

I I think it's real indictment actually of our politics that we've had so much cowardice in our political system that we've not been able to deal with this.

AnsweredAsked whether an estate levy is off the table. Says nothing is off the table, but he is not necessarily returning to his 2010 proposal.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

Very much so.

Laura Kuenssberg
If it's urgent, do you commit to doing this before 2029, before the next general election?

Well, I'm going to say that we stick to the manifesto cuz I have to keep people's trust as well. And there are commitments in the manifesto that would make it hard to do in this parliament.

AnsweredAsked whether he commits to doing it before the 2029 election. Says manifesto commitments make that hard in this parliament.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
just to be clear for people that commitments in the manifesto are not raising VAT, not raising income tax, and not raising national insurance that employees pay. But there could be a different kind of tax. There could be a hypothecated tax to use the the fancy word. Just to stick on timing cuz that's the question I'm asking here, really.

though that you're you're driving at? Trust is really important to me here. I don't think you can reform this system without it, without consensus. So, I'm saying to you that I will develop a very clear plan, and I will put that plan to the public at a general election. And that will be the That will be where the plan gets tested, and people will then be able to decide.

And I am prepared to put myself in that position, recognizing that it might be difficult or unpopular with some. But that is the way to do it, to get that endorsement, and then introduce the the system in the next parliament because the the backing of people for this really matters.

AnsweredPressed on timing. Says he will put a plan to the public at the next general election and introduce it in the next parliament.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
So, to be really clear, you've just set this out there. You are going to put to the country at the next general election a proposition for a care service that will be free at the point of use, paid for by everyone, and that will be on the ballot paper next time round.

And with precise explanation as to how it's going to be funded.

AnsweredAsked to confirm the proposal will be on the ballot paper. Confirms, with an explanation of how it will be funded.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

And people will be in no doubt about it at all. And some, you know, in the political world will be saying, watching this, "Oh my goodness, that's a a hostage to fortune. That's a rod for his own back." But do you know what? I am not going to do politics as usual as Prime Minister. Why is the country in the position that it's in?

Because politics has let people down. It has backed away from difficult issues like this. I am not going to do that as Prime Minister.

Laura Kuenssberg
But some people watching and your political critics and also a growing number of economists would say that the country is in the position it is because politicians have been too free with public money. They've not taken the economy seriously enough. They've not taken growing the economy seriously enough. And I just would would Let me Let me Let Let me ask this question because since you've been in power, you have outlined and talked about social care, but you've put more money more spending on housing. You want more money for rough sleeping, more money on cheaper bus fares. You've taken some money off energy bills. The problem comes on the other side of the ledger. Now, you've saved some money by canceling the digital ID project. That was 1 and 1/2 billion pounds, but money that actually hadn't been allocated in in the first place. What is it are you willing to ditch in order to make the sums add up? Because one of your critics, you know, said that you're like Father Christmas. You can't just be Santa Burnham. The economy is in quite a precarious state. The debt is 98% of the whole economy.

me just come back to some of the things that you're picking out there, and the things that I'm prioritizing. If you look at social care, it's preventative. So, it Wait. Wait. You've got No, no.

You've got to let me answer this question. It's preventative. You can spend a few pounds supporting people properly in people's homes so that you don't spend thousands of pounds when people are unnecessarily in a hospital, but if you look at rough sleeping, if you support people with accommodation and help them off the street, that costs less than having rough sleepers going in and out of A&E or in and out of police custody. If you support people with bus fares, you support people into jobs and into training. So, the policies are carefully thought through because they are policies that are quite productive in terms of the effect that they have and the way that they then reduce pressure on the wider public purse.

Partly answeredAsked what he would cut to make the sums add up. Argues his spending on care, rough sleeping and bus fares saves money later; names nothing he would cut.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
you will get money back in the long term, but the other costs that are going up, the cost of borrowing for the government has been going up and up and up. If you look at the numbers, you know, the amount of interest that we're paying on the country's debts as a country is absolutely

Yeah.

Yeah.

Ceremonial, not rated: Backchannel: the replies are 'Yeah.' while she continues the point about borrowing costs, which leads into x18.

Laura Kuenssberg
And there is concern in your party, too, that you're quite motivated and happy maybe to spend taxpayers' cash on things that you understandably care about, things that your party cares about. But the former business secretary Peter Kyle told us this weekend, you have to care as much about growing the economy as you do about rough sleeping or trying to give people a little bit of help.

right to say that and in my former job, I oversaw the fastest growing economy in the country, which is Greater Manchester, and you're going to hear from the mayor of the Liverpool City Region soon. He has got Liverpool as a city and as a wider region also growing faster than the whole economy. When in our lifetimes have we been able to say that the city of Liverpool is growing faster than other places?

AnsweredTold a former minister says he must care as much about growth. Agrees and cites growth in Greater Manchester and Liverpool.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
now and you know very well that there are many economists who look at the state of the UK and think this cannot go on in this way. So, where are you prepared to cut back

let's focus on where we are and let's not get into a position where we've just got a narrative of doom about all of this. We are the fastest growing economy in the G7 right now And credit to what Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves did to get that turnaround going. We're all repairing the damage of the Liz Truss mini-budget. And that has that has impacted That has impacted [clears throat] the gold medal. You know, the fact is

DodgedAsked where he is prepared to cut back. Rejects a 'narrative of doom' and cites G7 growth and the mini-budget, without naming any cut.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
No, no one is No one's asking for a gold medal. Oil is once again at 100 pounds a barrel. There are predictions that energy bills will hit five 500 pounds extra from January onwards. Yes, as Keir Starmer sat in that chair and did the same thing saying that yes, there were some good signs of growth. The point is there is real concern in the financial markets about the health of the British economy.

Yes, there is.

AnsweredTold there is real concern in financial markets. Agrees there is.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
So, can you tell us today somewhere where you're willing to cut or something that you're willing to ditch in order to balance the books?

Well, if people wait If people wait till Tuesday, they will see that I am prepared to take those type of decisions because I won't I won't do what the previous Conservative government did and take risks with the economy that actually are still hurting us right now. So, I won't do that and I'm very conscious of everything that you've just said in relation to the febrile state of the global economy. If you look at where we were, the fundamentals of the British economy were moving in the right direction until the Middle East until the Middle East conflict. And that has put fuel prices up at the pump. It's had an impact on people's energy costs.

And we will now have to to deal with that and support people as best we can through through the budget. And we will do and we will do those things but in a way that is highly prudent with the running of the UK economy. And the Chancellor of the Exchequer is very, very clear about that.

Declined openlyAsked to name something he would cut. Says people should wait for Tuesday's speech, then discusses the Middle East conflict and prudence.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
One of the things though that people particularly in the business community but probably lots of people watching will look at and say is just, you know, might want to throw their hands up in exasperation. Again, building another runway at Heathrow seems to have been delayed. Rachel Reeves used to say that would bring billions of extra pounds to the economy. Are you going to back another runway Heathrow? There has to be a vote in Parliament.

Well, there's been a consultation on it and it's a it's a

Declined openlyAsked whether he backs a third Heathrow runway. Points to the consultation without giving a view.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
Are you going to back it?

It's a contested issue, isn't it? In London itself. I think principally it's a matter for London and London's

Declined openlyAsked again whether he backs it. Calls it a contested issue mainly for London.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
a vote in Parliament and you're the Prime Minister. Are you going to back it or not?

the voice of of people there first. It's not right for me to just jump straight in on the back of the consultation. The consultation has to be

Declined openlyAsked again, as Prime Minister with a vote due. Says it is not right to jump in before the consultation is considered.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
been going on for decades. No one's jumping straight in. You've pretty much expressed doubt.

we hear what people have said through the consultation and then then consider the way forward from there.

Ceremonial, not rated: Interjection ('No one's jumping straight in'); the reply continues the answer begun under x24.

Laura Kuenssberg
That sounds like you're not up for it cuz the London Mayor said he can't isn't that up for it.

consultation but there are different views and you have to take those views seriously in coming to a decision.

Declined openlyTold he sounds unenthusiastic. Says there are different views to weigh before a decision.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
Will the welfare bill have gone down by the next general election?

I would like to see that happen.

Partly answeredAsked whether the welfare bill will be lower by the election. Says he would like that to happen.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
commit to doing it?

I if I can do that, I would do that. The problem The reason why I hesitate and the reason why people say, "Well, what what's he actually saying here?" I don't think you get the welfare bill down on a sustainable basis if it's crude cuts cuz that just plunges people into crisis and then they will appear in a different part of the system and you have to spend more public money. And that's the way we've run things in this country if I could make this point.

Declined openlyAsked to commit to it. Says he would if he could and explains he will not make crude cuts.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

on a grand scale. So many people in their 20s stuck on benefits. I don't want to see people in their 20s stuck on benefits but

Laura Kuenssberg
does and why I'm discussing this with you is for the commitment I'm asking you to

because we didn't support them when they needed help because we didn't support them when they needed help with an education system that was as much about technical qualifications as the university route. I think we've let young people down there. We didn't support them with the mental health support that they need. We've got the Milburn report coming soon and this is another area where I will take the decisions necessary to give young people the support that they need when they need it so that we can reduce the number of people in work. And the thing is I'm going to come back to my record.

As mayor of Greater Manchester, I oversaw a change to the benefit system that got more people into work. So, I know how to do this cuz I've already done it in the real world.

Ceremonial, not rated: Too garbled to judge fairly: the caption question is a fragment ('does and why I'm discussing this with you is for the commitment I'm asking you to') and the turns around it are doubtful; the commitment question is rated under x27 and x28.

Laura Kuenssberg
will hear you'd like to get the bill down, but you won't commit to it being down by the election. Let's talk about another important issue cuz we've got a lot of your time today, but we are running short of it, um, believe it or not. Um, a lot of people have got concerns right now in this country about the security of our borders and the safety of all of our communities. And I think in the last few weeks many of people have been shocked to see masked men

Mhm.

Unacceptable.

Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in to the question put under x32; the replies are 'Mhm.' and 'Unacceptable.'.

Laura Kuenssberg
They describe themselves as patriots. Are they?

Unacceptable. Creating fear and intimidation on British streets. This is not something we've seen in this country before, uh, and it's not something we want to see. There are real worries about immigration in in all parts of the country, to be honest. I heard it at my own by-election in Makerfield on the doorstep.

And I told people then on those doorsteps that I would take this issue seriously. But let's look The thing about this let's look at the facts. So, net migration is down 80% on what it was in the Boris Johnson era. Boat crossings are down 50% this year on what they were in the early 2020.

And I will be relentless in addressing their concerns, but people also have to look at the facts. And they also have to see when people are playing the worst kind of politics with this issue that is leading to people feeling afraid in their own communities.

Partly answeredAsked whether the masked protesters are patriots. Calls them unacceptable and creating fear, then turns to migration figures, without addressing the word.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
You said we are seeing something new in the manner of these what you describe as unacceptable protests. Um, one of the leaders of these protests is a man called Danny Tommo. Do you think he's a racist?

Well, it's it's hard to conclude that he's anything other than someone

Ceremonial, not rated: Cut-off fragment: the reply stops mid-sentence ('anything other than someone') and continues under x35.

Laura Kuenssberg
Well, your home your home secretary said he was. She said he was an outright racist.

know, I hesitate always before I you know, I've not read everything that he said. I've not followed everything that he's that he's done. So, I'm just going to say that because I don't just throw labels on people. But given everything and the way he's behaving and what he's seeking to whip up. I mean, this is the worst kind of um hateful behavior.

Partly answeredTold the Home Secretary called the protest leader an outright racist. Declines to apply the label as he has not read everything he has said, but calls his behaviour hateful.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
There are though, as you've said, people who are very worried about what's happening in their own communities. What do you say to the women of Paddington or villagers in Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire who are really worried about these small communities being asked to live side by side with more than a thousand young men, asylum seekers, coming to live in their communities?

So, I've said, you know, all the way through, those concerns are understandable and they have to be addressed in whatever solution is is finally agreed. There were also concerns expressed about the use of hotels and the reason why the nature of accommodation is changing across the country is because a commitment was given to end the use of hotels. And that was what many people were calling for a few years ago. And it's linked to that change that obviously we're seeing the need to use other types of accommodation.

AnsweredAsked what he would say to communities near large asylum sites. Says their concerns are understandable and must be addressed, and explains the move away from hotels.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
pay the price for successive governments' failures? I mean, isn't there another solution? Your predecessor actually at one point was looking at trying to send people who'd come here without permission to other countries, to Albania. Now, that didn't work out. But are you prepared to look at something more radical?

Well, I'm not going to to overclaim here, but there is some evidence now that there isn't just failure, that things are going in the right direction. As I say, the main thing is to get boat crossings down, and you know, we've seen uh different types of vessels and different types of arrivals in recent times. That's a sign that the tactics are actually working, and the gangs are having to change what they are doing.

DodgedAsked whether he would look at something more radical, such as removals to other countries. Says current tactics are working, without saying whether he would consider other options.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
But overall, the figure for this year is still higher than it was in 2024. So, yes, you're right, the number of summer crossings is lower than it has been for some time, but the overall figure this year is still happening. A couple of undocumented boats slipped through this week.

down and it's down on last year, and it's a lot down on what it was in the early 2020s. Don't read this as complacency, though, Laura. I will be relentless in addressing this issue. Working with the Home Secretary, I'm looking at every single way that we can do more to get the numbers down, and the Home Secretary, in my view, has done a really good job. She's got a strong grip on this issue.

What we have been doing is working, but more is needed, and more will be done.

AnsweredTold the year's figure is still above 2024. Says crossings are down on last year and the early 2020s and more will be done.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
People might be able to hear this in protest going on outside. We're not sure what people are protesting about. It's quite a normal thing to happen at a party conference, but just if you can hear that in the background, then that is what is going on. I just lastly want to ask you about what's happening in Northern Ireland this morning. There's been real tension this morning between two communities, um the Drumcree, which of course years ago was the scene of some of the most serious disorder in Northern Ireland. Um the government could have overturned the decision here and said that the parade shouldn't be allowed to go ahead. What is your view of what's going on? Are you concerned about it?

Well, I've spoken to the Northern Ireland Secretary this morning, and I don't think it's um correct to say what you've just said. The decision would have to be made on the recommendation of the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, and that recommendation has not has not been made. And obviously, there has been a decision from the Parades Commission, the Independent Parades Commission, upheld in the courts. The job that I have, that the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland has, is upholding the Good Friday Agreement, and I take that responsibility really seriously. It's 30 years old next year.

It's also the responsibility of the Taoiseach in the Republic of Ireland, and I spoke to him yesterday because we work very closely together on all of these matters. Now, I know it's a a tense situation, as you as you say. We do appeal for calm on all sides. There have been big gains made in in Northern Ireland, and we don't want to see things go backwards. So, obviously a challenging situation today, but you know, it's very important that we we work to bring calm.

AnsweredAsked his view of the Drumcree situation and whether the government could have stopped the parade. Disputes the premise, explains the process and appeals for calm.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Laura Kuenssberg
A huge amount on your plate, and we're grateful for your time this morning. I just must ask you this. This is a huge week for you, huge moment. Someone in government said, "He just loves being Prime Minister." Is that true? You're loving it?

Well, yes, it's it's obviously hard, but I do I do I love it for the fact that you can do something to help people. And the thing I would just want people to know about me, I don't want the job because I want the job and whatever the the status or anything like that. I want the job because of what I can do with the job. And people won't be in any doubt about what I'm trying to do. They will be really clear about it.

It's up to them then whether they agree with what I'm trying to do. But they'll see on on Tuesday. I am here to do something. I am here to end the decade of drift and division that we've had since Brexit cuz it's not been a great decade for Britain. I want to set out a really clear direction based on honesty.

You knew I was right to press me earlier on, and I'll say more about those things about social care at the at the conference. But from that can come hope. If we're really clear about where Britain is going in this next decade, laid out clearly, I think that's where we get hope again because people can say, "Okay, I understand what he's doing, why he said that, and I can see that as a path that could take Britain to a better place." And that's what this week is all about.

AnsweredAsked whether he loves being Prime Minister. Says yes, because of what he can do with the job.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person