Sky News interview with Beth Rigby in Scotland: local election hopes, council tax promises and NHS funding
Video: YouTube: Sky News (official channel). Retrieved 9 Oct 2026.
The words of Nigel Farage. Transcript from the video's captions, fetched on 2026-10-09; not an official record. Captions do not say who is speaking: Polifiles assigned each turn by reading the captions, without checking the audio. Sky News' upload of the extended interview recorded in Scotland before a Reform UK rally, three weeks before the May elections (6 minutes), from the first question to his last answer; her closing "Okay. I accept that." is left out. The captions run the two voices together for much of the interview and cut the start of many lines, so turns are assigned by meaning rather than by the '>>' marks, and some boundaries are uncertain. Short interjections are given to Beth Rigby (for example "Mhm.", "Yes.", "Sorry. I know we've got", "I've got I've got the transcript here.", "I'm really really really sorry. said it doesn't work. It's not working.", "want to look at insurance models potentially.") and others to Nigel Farage (for example "Take it in the round.", "Thank you.", "It's exactly.", "It's never been my"). Her reading of his answer from the previous year ("I do not want it funded through general taxation...") is part of her question. Trimmed: starts at "Nigel, thanks for speaking to us today."; ends at "I've got more to do.". Questions are shown in grey boxes. Tap a marked sentence to see the label and its sources. Other speakers' full contributions are in the video.
Complex series of answers. You know, here in Scotland to become the opposition would be amazing.
Be absolutely amazing. Um and if we embed ourselves there, we can move on in the years to come. In Wales well, we're neck and neck right now, and literally neck and neck with Plaid in those polls. Uh the Labour Party particularly in the valleys, you know, Keir Hardie real birthplace of the Labour Party almost disappearing off the map. So to be frank coming first in Wales is is the ambition.
Whether we can remains to be seen.
of the party but I as leader of the party relentlessly, as I'm doing this year
toured the country for 2 months
put up thousands of candidates individuals or groups may say different things. The fact is I was very careful last year, even when I spoke to you that night on the eve of the election, very careful not to over-promise and under-deliver.
of 10 councils. Have a look at the council tax rises in the Reform UK councils compared to the other parties.
Take it in the round.
Thank you.
Ceremonial, not rated: Garbled captions: the interviewer concedes a point and asks for nothing; the reply is a fragment ('Thank you.') whose speaker is uncertain.
Yes.
So we can stand on our record.
Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: she agrees Reform councils' rises have been lower and says she is not arguing the point; the replies are 'Yes.' and 'So we can stand on our record.', and her question follows under x11.
never saw that leaflet, and if I had, I would have decried it.
I went round the country relentlessly saying we would save money and keep council tax rises to the absolute minimum. And you know what? A year on, we have delivered.
I spoke to all the local media. I did everything I could do to make the message very, very clear.
North Korea. I can't control it. I can't control individuals and thousands of people what they say.
No, no, no, no, I never said
It's never been my
been my position. The NHS is funded through general taxation. The question is, what do you do with the money, and how do you spend the money? I never ever
Ceremonial, not rated: Interjection ('I've got the transcript here'); the reply continues the answer begun under x16.
It's exactly.
Ceremonial, not rated: Lead-in: she reads out his answer from the previous year and puts her question under x19; the reply here is a fragment ('It's exactly.') whose speaker is uncertain.
taken in through taxation. The question then is, how do you spend the money? And there are other models in our European neighbors where where taxpayers' money is farmed out through efficient, competitive ways that gets better bang for the buck. There's no contradiction there at all. None whatsoever.
look at how the money we pay to the government is spent. And if it's spent If public money is better spent through insurance companies or even private companies competing with hip replacements, if we get more people being treated, so much the better. And And And this is what's so awkward about this. You know, we've gone from being 7.5% of GDP to 11.5% of GDP in the last few years expenditure on health with fewer hospital beds with worse outcomes. This isn't working.
What I'm trying to work out is, how do we get better bang for our buck? The fundamental model is something that we believe in. We all pay according to income. And we all have the access to it being free at the point of delivery. The bit in the middle is going horribly wrong.
Yes. And And And And And And you know, in terms of in terms of business, energy, in terms of immigration, crime, in terms of Shadow Chancellor, education, all of that I put in place this year. I've got more to do.